![]() News Archives 2001 - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jly Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2000 - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jly Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1999 - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jly Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1998 - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jly Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1997 - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jly Aug Sep Oct Nov DecSite Map |
Wednesday, May 30, 2001
New Milkshape Version (15:00 PST) Mailing List Gets Going (17:45 PST) Playtesting Underway (17:15 PST) I am currently working on some tutorials for the HSRPS to help clarify
the rules. Hack and Slash Mailing List (15:30 PST) FREE GAME ARTS (00:30 PST) X-Box Falls! (00:10 PST) It's a real shame because I know guys personally working on X-Box games. Counting on the X-Box is just putting your faith in the devil. "Besides, what does the X-Box have that my PC doesn't? Nothing, which
may explain it's name: X-Box." Freedom Rock (00:30 PST) I don't want to hear about how they are enemies to the sharing of information. They were the 1st band I was ever a fan of that had special seatting for people who wanted to take video cameras into thier concerts, and this was in a time when such acts were usually forbidden. Also, there are various enslaving forces like certain drugs and corporations that inhibit communication, enslaving forces Metallica's music has taken a bold stance against. I don't know much about their personal lives, but very positive ideals come out strongly in their music. Going after Metallica for harrasing Napster is like going after John Carmack for not open sourcing the Quake 3 engine. The fact is John Carmack has done us all a major service through his periodic open sourcing of key game engines, and I think he gets very little credit for it. I think Metallica is much the same way, they've enriched this world by giving modern music a much needed serious note. Just as Mr. Carmack has the right to not open source any of his code he doesn't want to, Metallica should not be spat upon for not releasing thier music as "free" if they don't want to. They would not have been able to work as hard on thier music to make it as good as they did if it had not been for the music providing enough money to make a living. If artists cannot reserve the right to be fed like everyone else, then the world suffers great losses in terms of potential accomplishment. However, do not put Bill Gates nor any of his ilk on the same pedestal with
Carmack and Metallica. Gate's kind have not done, do not do, and will not do the world
any favors. What have they contributed? Nothing but pain.
FREE GAME ARTS (01:10 PST) News for E3 (16:50 PST) But what about the Play Station 2? Can you say "only two controll ports"? I knew you could. If Sony slacks on something as vital as that, it shows how disconected with thier audience they actually are. But what of the Xbox? Well, it's Microsoft, and that's a sure bet for instability. Besides, what does it have that my PC doesn't? Nothing, which may explain it's name: "X-box." But what about Nintendo? Hey, what do they have that my word processing, e-mailing, web browsing, CD playing/recording, game hacking PC doesn't already have? One thing and one thing only: Game Boy Advanced. It's portable. You don't have to worry about your cartiges getting scratched. It's inexpensive. It's the main thing the Game Cube has going for it. In terms of longevity, is or is not the Game Boy the most successful platform of all time? And of course Nintendo has some decent developers, even the Super Dodge Ball team. Unfortunately because of the extream lack of inovation in video games in the last few years, 3rd person POV games with decent play controll on the PC have become virtually non-existant. I suppose this has effected the Super Dodge Ball team's idea of what is and is not a good game, because they currently have no plans to make a River City Ransom sequel. Zack Parsons has suggested that we all e-mail the creators of Super Doge Ball and insist they make a sequel to the greatest game of all time (River City Ransom,) and let them know that we want more of the goodness that is River City Ransom. I have a better idea. Instead of making all of these 1st POS shooters, racing games and generic RTS, why doesn't the gameing community focus on making the arcade style play control role playing games that we all like to play anyhow? River City Ransom wasn't the only one, The Secret of Mana also comes to mind. Smash Brothers (the most commonly played game here at Galbraith Games,) is going in the right direction, BUT it still lacks the full blown glory of games like The Secret of Mana and River City Ransom (Note: these games are multi-player through most if not all of the game.) This is what the up comming Hack and Slash project is all about. As a horror
fan I was very disapointed by the pathetic excuse for games that was the so called
"Blair Witch Trilogy." The last thing anyone ever wants to see is another "Resident Evil"
play control style game. Then we have Mr. Clive Barker and his game. It's great, for a 1st
POS shooter, which unfortunatley that is all Undying amounts to. I remember his
Nightbreed game, now that was innovative! But imagine how much better all of these horror games
would have been if they had just been more like the Secret of Mana or River City Ransom! Why
aren't the games we want to play being made?! Play Control > RPG System > Graphics. Arcade play control + good RPG system =
great game!!
Swamped! (21:15 PST) Meanwhile, check out that Open Quartz Test review
at 3D Action Planet if you haven't already read it. It's not just cool,
it's hilarious. Open Quartz Review (14:20 PST) New GPL Monster (21:45 PST) 3D Files to the rescue (20:10 PST) Also, I should thank Demo-files for being the 1st site to put up the Open Quartz Test besides our own. Thank you Demo-files. Rumor has it that our next really big release will be a vastly
improved stand alone version of Hack and Slash. What's interesting
about this is that it's the direction we've been trying to go in since
before... well, since before we ever put up this web page.
Ali presents more sounds (18:10 PST) Nehahra News (11:55 PST) If you haven't seen The Seal of Nehahra, you can get
a version you
don't have to have Quake to watch (make sure you watch all of the episodes!!)
One of the interesting things about the whole Nehahra project is that
it sort of fills in the blanks with all of the Quake 1 plot holes. It's
a very serious compliment to the original Quake 1 game its self. GPL Player Model (14:45 PST) As a special bonus, the GPL Player Model comes with a cartoon outline version. The cartoon outline was generated by our automatic cartoon outline generator utility, and the cartoon skin was drawn by yours truly (not too tricky :-) Because the GPL Player Model is now fully skinned and animated in
MilkShape 3D,
it is now much easier to modify it for use in other games, or even
create new GPL characters from it. GPL ... Models? (14:30 PST) 0. This License applies to any program or other work which contains a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed under the terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below, refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program" means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law... [emphasis added] For Open Quartz the GPL is especially important because we have
designed the GPL content to complement GPL software like the GPL Quake
engine and Quake-C source and the various GPL engines and mods that have
been and will be spawned from them. Because the content is GPL, it can
always be distributed with the program. NPR Quake (18:00 PST) GPL Quake for Macs! (13:50 PST) Other news today is that the Squawk bestiary is making slow
but steady progess, and is still not ready for the public eye.
12,000+ O.Q.Test Downloads! (13:20 PST) Help! (16:45 PST) Aardappel's Free Textures: (20:30 PST) Check out Aardappel's
web page for some happening maps! Qoole 99 Editor now GPL! (20:12 PST) qbism? (16:20 PST) Thursday, May 3, 2001 Microsoft Threatens Global Democracy (10:20 PST) Microsoft is promoting the lie that companies won't be able to protect their intellectual property from the infectious GPL license. The truth is that mere aggregation, such as using GPL and non-GPL software together or putting them on the same disk, does not apply the GPL to the non-GPL software. Also, if someone distributes your non-GPL software as part of GPL software without your permission, then that distribution is illegal and the GPL license is void. Vice President Irving Wladawsky-Berger, IBM: Senior Vice President Craig Mundie, Microsoft: Richard M. Stallman, Free Software Foundation: So, take your pick: the GPL has the backing of programmers, IBM's lawyer farm, and at least 12 countries. Microsoft (which apparently does not respect programmers, the law, or the sovereignty of nations) has Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. Free Software is not a threat to innovation. Proprietary software
is often a threat to innovation, and the GPL counters that threat
by encouraging innovation. OQ Test at Demo-Files (11:30 PST) Feel free to link to the Open Quartz Test or duplicate it at your own
sites (unless you are also hosted by GameSpy, I'm sure they don't need
extra copies :-) The GPL license also allows you to freely distribute the
Open Quartz Test on magazine CDs and other media.
Free Sounds (09:00 PST) |